Better grades for sex.

Augsburger judges negotiate an extremely piquant case: According to a professor accused wanted the notes to supplement an exam candidate - in return for sex. The offer has been immoral with a hidden camera filmed, professor and student to land in court.

 

Before the district court must Augsburg on Thursday, a professor at the University of Augsburg responsibility - because "attempted bribery in Tateinheit with attempted coercion in a very serious case". He is a student, have suggested that their final score to improve when they are with him for a longer sexual relationship.

The indictment, from which the court quoted as telling a story from a dime novel. Thus, a student at the University of Augsburg repeatedly called for a master's final examination is written. When she accused the professor now aufsuchte to the topics of the examination to discuss, it stresses the importance for them the test was. In the event of a failure, it had the 5000 euro professors offered - it could also "cook, clean or with him" to go to the movies, "the district court cited the indictment of the public prosecutor of Augsburg.

Domestic money and favors to married Endfünfziger but are not interested, just "sexual services". In a later interview, the student learned that the note of the written examination "not enough" is. According to the prosecution renewed its offensive Professor proposal, the grade for sex income - but this time before an ongoing hidden camera.

Detective with the threat of television

The student had prior to the meeting by a private detective with surveillance technology can equip parts of the conversation had with image and sound have been recorded. On the next appointment would be by the student engaged private detective and had published the professor warned that the records a private TV channel zuzuspielen should not modify the written note and the note in the examination is 3.3.

The prosecution responded that the professor - though not quite as desired: although he had written the note to the master's exam actually from 4.7 to 4.3 changed, but before the oral examination the dean of the University of Augsburg informed. The dean had written themselves to the leadership of the university, which they then Augsburger Prosecutor fax.

The bribery affair in Augsburg had at the Economics Faculty of the University have been given, reports the "Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung. The student should have already noticed, because they are "crowded" and a work content simply copied from the Internet did, writes the newspaper continued.

Proceedings against the student

The case recalls that of a corrupt law professor in Hanover: The wind had by "promotion advisers" is not only about 150,000 euros for the acceptance of promotional candidates collects, but also a
sexual relationship with a student and maintained systematically for these grades and credits preferred. The corrupt professor had three years in detention, the student
1800 Euro fine for paying bribes.

The Augsburg justice focuses not only on the corruption and coercion charge against the professor - the student must be responsible. They said the senior prosecutor Matthias Augsburger Nickolai blogs ONLINE, there is "more criminal cases." Secret audio and video recordings are prohibited because they violate confidentiality of the word. Moreover, the prosecutor put it because of the 5000 Euro and the subsequent threat to the video material "attempted bribery and coercion" to load, so the prosecutor.

Because the student a punishment than 1000 euro contradicted, it is now a separate case before the court. The detective is suspected complicity despite not prosecuted because he was already in another, much more serious procedure has been condemned and prohibited by the Code of Criminal Procedure that less serious offenses should not be prosecuted.

The professor is the faculty continues to operate. A university spokesman, however pointed out that the university dienstaufsichtlich action against him and the accused had conversations with students under four eyes, and the decline of tests was prohibited. Disciplinary action will be after the conclusion of the proceedings.